Showing posts with label labeling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label labeling. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 14, 2020

Being a Victim of Change

Being a victim in and of a changing world
(focusing on white fragility)


In a world that is changing exponentially, in a world where knowledge

of our world is changing exponentially, we can choose to keep up or to play the role of the victim whining about what we do not like and do not understand; either because we can't or because we refuse.


For a long time, I refused to not share anything related to politics or religion on social media because of the compulsive trolls that get a kick out of social media bullying. I get a kick out of people that think they know me more than I know myself and have all the perfect labels and names to call me. I never go to other people's facebook page and argue. I feel that is insulting and crossing boundaries. But I tell them that, although their insults are not welcome on my page, they are free to take anything from my page and start an argument on their own page. (I don't think that works) BUT what has changed is that I will not let someone come at me with this know-it-all attitude that is so prevalent now days without me speaking the truth in love back to them.


This is the email forward sent sent by a family member. Below is my response.


The Email: privilege or fragility?

The content of this email is a perfect example of two of my recent posts:   https://livingwithopenhands2.blogspot.com/2020/04/labeling-categorizing-and-eliminating.html and
____________________________________

Monday, April 6, 2020

Labeling, Categorizing, Dehumanizing ,and Eliminating

The Objectifying Power of Labeling

Using a language of dehumanization

Weaponizing Words

Name-calling is a form of violence and control

Why do we need to dehumanize the “Other”?
Why can't we be human together?

One of my greatest pet peeves is being called a name, any name, outside my own name. No one likes it. Not only that but it breeds mistaken identity. There is no way that one word can sum up all that a person is all about. And yet we continue to be the know-it-all and show off our intelligence (lack of) by our deft use of words. Now that I know, I can show you that I know all about you and maybe even show the world how much I know. As kids when someone did that we taunted with, "Your intelligence is showing!" with the whole playground knowing what we really mean, "Your lack of intelligence is showing!" "Your ignorance is showing!" How often do we hear people from all walks of life all the way up to the highest position in the land labeling whole groups of people with words like:

Liberal, conservative, progressive, fundamentalist, evangelical, Christian, Muslim, atheist, agnostic, right-wing, left-wing, Democrat, Republican, disabled, able-bodied, heterosexual, LGBTQIA, black, white, brown, middle class, rich, poor, beautiful, ugly ...  And yet, are we not all human? And yet we stubbornly use names and labels thinking we know, but showing we know nothing.

Besides the destructiveness and violence of name-calling and insulting, this practice is a great absurdity in so many ways showing great human ignorance:

  1. The nature of words and language show us that labeling and name-calling can never be true. Language is made up of words. And words cannot be the reality. They are only signs and symbols that point to the reality. 
  2. Using the person’s given name does no good for categorizing them because your name is not a descriptor. It is only a distinguisher. That’s it. But for me anyway, that’s the only way that is acceptable simply so we can distinguish the person we wish to talk to. In other words, never call me anything outside of my name.
  3. The words we use do not demonstrate our competence or power. Like a bully, they are simply a reflection of our shallow paucity of character.
  4. Given that it is impossible to label a person’s character, qualities, values, and beliefs by using one word, how much more absurd is it to use a whole group of people by using one word. Individuals are much too complex for this to work and thus a group is infinitesimally more complex and impossible.
  5. Beyond the complexity of each and every individual, there is the complexity of all of these political and religious ideologies and categories that we think we “know” when we use blanket name-calling.
  6. So my initial conclusion to this absurdity is that name-calling can never be meaningful, accurate, or useful, so it ends up being a weaponization of words to use against a person or a group in order to violate the identity or integrity of that person or group; demeaning and destroying those people in one’s mind and in the minds of others. 
  7. The definition I use for violence happens to be one from Parker Palmer, “Violence is when we violate the identity and integrity of another.” Sound familiar?
  8. My conclusion regarding this ridiculous practice is that it is the lazy man’s way of spouting off what he doesn’t know and has no ability or desire to learn. And with the extreme derogatory effects it has can quickly become an act of violence and hence war; either individually or collectively.
We are so quick to label people often resulting in false stereotypes, prejudice, and racism. We label so we can separate something out from the whole and understand it better; knowing more precisely what we are getting. Labeling works great in a grocery store. We can see what it is we are buying and even find out all of the ingredients contained in it . . . by the label assigned to the product.

Labeling is also necessary in the medical field and the mental health field. Labels are used in diagnoses which help doctors to prescribe medication and hospitals to provide treatment. These labels also can be tied to funding sources that would not have been available without the label.

And to bring in another perspective, it is impossible to live in this world without using labels. After all, words themselves are signs and symbols that point to reality. In other words, even words are a form of labeling. But that’s precisely why we are so quickly hoodwinked and hijacked; deceived by labels. Life is full of them and they are familiar. And when something is familiar, we tend to take it for granted and allow it to go on autopilot; disengaging our minds. When that happens then it is very easy to mindlessly succumb and become numb to name calling and other labels out of laziness, the lack of effort to communicate mindfully and meaningfully.

All communication must be intentional. We must know what it is that we want to say, how we want to say it, and make sure that what we say brings the result that we are looking for. So often, the process gets hijacked and we end up with a train wreck because we were not intentional about what we need to say, why we need to say it, how we need to say it, and how we need it to come out. We are responsible for each and every word we say and we know that, as the Bible says, a word can be a spark that starts a fire that burns down a forest; everything we value.

Tuesday, March 31, 2020

My Sacred Path of the Amoeba

Digesting and Discerning Truth

Originally Posted on April 1, 2017 in Living with OPen Hands 1.0



If a person says that my statement is judgmental, isn’t THAT being judgmental? Am I being judgmental by asking this question???
Why do we so often judge others and their ideas? What do we fear? Why do we need to set things straight right then and right there?
What is true anyway? Well, it depends on each person’s perspective. 10 people can see the same situation and come away with 10 different descriptions of that same situation.
Do I need to be right?  Does truth need to be “defended”? Why?
Can it not stand on its own? Usually we “defend” the weak and vulnerable from being hurt or destroyed? Is that what we think about truth? Is it our duty to defend the truth? If we do not defend it, then it will melt away or become a victim of an overpowering idea?
What is the source of our constant argumentation? Why do we cut ourselves short of understanding another? What do we fear? Being wrong? Not being right? Being different? Being the same?
We spend our lives quibbling facts and disputing words without bothering to understand what it is we are disputing and quibbling about... or why.
Do we even want to understand another? Are we afraid of their difference? Are we afraid of our own ideas crumbling, or crashing down around us, or melting away?
Understanding requires the effort and the intention to understand.
Understanding requires the effort and the intention of listening.
Why is it so hard to listen?
We cannot listen
    • Over our chattering mind
    • Over our need to be right
    • If we are busy formulating our response
    • If we already think we know what the person is going to say
    • If we judge the person’s words and ideas

    • If we are busy labeling right or wrong