Tuesday, July 30, 2019

Downloaded Thinking / Cultural Conditioning


Living from the inside out.

“Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it.” Proverbs 22:6.
This is usually quoted as a command or an admonition telling us how to raise our children. But the context of this proverb shines a different light. The whole chapter is a list of statements of reality,
Imagewarnings of how life works.
For example, the next proverb says that the rich rule the poor and the borrower is slave to the lender. This is not telling us that the rich SHOULD rule over the poor or that the lender SHOULD become the master of the borrower. This is simply a statement of fact, the way of life, and a warning of how life works.
An ancient Jewish scientist, philosopher, and Rabbi, Ralbag, suggested an alternative, satirical interpretation of this proverb:
“Train a child in the way of evil and when he is old, he will not depart from it.”
My paraphrase based on this interpretation is “Beware of this: the way you raise your child is what that child will grow up to be.” Remember that your most powerful way of teaching is you; your words and your actions (role modeling).

The Necessity of Diversity



“We need to depend on diversity”

CELEBRATE!!! Every word and thought, every opinion and belief, every perspective and
understanding is filtered through a lifetime of personal experiences. That's why each person's viewpoint is so completely different from others. Diversity is embedded deep in our bones. Diversity is not only external but internal. CELEBRATE!!!


EXTERNAL DIVERSITY (visible like race, ethnicity, age, physical disabilities, sexual orientation...) and
INTERNAL DIVERSITY (invisible like values, beliefs, perspectives, hidden disabilities, sexual identity...)


No two people see things the same. Diverse perspectives are as common as the air we breathe; essential and inevitable and permeating all aspects of the life that we share.

Sunday, July 28, 2019

Permanency

If your knowledge of fire has been turned to certainty by words alone, 
then seek to be cooked by the fire itself. 
Don't abide in borrowed certainty. 
There is no real certainty until you burn; 
if you wish for this, sit down in the fire.


“Transience is the force of time that makes a ghost of every experience. There was never a dawn, regardless how beautiful or promising, that did not grow into a noontime. There was never a noon that did not fall into afternoon. There was never an afternoon that did not fade toward evening. There never was a day yet that did not get buried in the graveyard of the night. In this way transience makes a ghost out of everything that happens to us.”
— John O’Donohue (Anam Cara: A Book of Celtic Wisdom)
We build our lives around permanency. Retirement savings is assumed to be permanent security. Homes and families are built on the human construct of permanency. Careers, income, and possessions . . . all create a sense of permanency.
I wonder why that is? We know that nothing is permanent. We trick ourselves into believing that stuff is permanent. But down deep we know it is not. We’ve seen it.
Everywhere, everything is dying. Flowers, grass, people, skin … everything is dying and making way for new life. New life is only possible if things are in constant flux, constantly changing, dying. New creation and new life come from chaos and death. This is the way the world is designed.

Death as an Ally

“Perhaps the whole root of our trouble, the human trouble, is that we will sacrifice all the beauty of our lives, will imprison ourselves in totems, taboos, crosses, blood sacrifices, steeples, mosques, races, armies, flags, nations, in order to deny the fact of death, which is the only fact we have.”
— James Baldwin
Saint Benedict said, “Daily keep your death before your eyes.” 

It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house of feasting, for death is the destiny of every man; the living deathperspectiveshould take this to heart. (Ecclesiastes 7:2)
In the face of death, the straw man burns. When I realize that “no one gets out of here alive”, not even me, it makes me stop and wonder, really question, what am I doing, who am I, and what am I leaving behind . . . because no matter what, I am leaving. Nothing is permanent, including me. Nothing. So why do I cling so tightly to social status, to possessions, to money, to my home, to my family, to my life??? And on a level deeper yet, why do I cling so tightly to my loves, my desires, my abilities, my strengths, my gifts… for nothing is permanent… it all fades away.
Do I fear death so much that it makes me shun silence in this life? From silence I came. To silence I will return. But while I’m here, I make noise as much and as continuously as I can. I stay busy, I keep moving . . . Smell the roses? What roses? Take time? I don’t have time. I have to get here, get there; “too many people to see, too many places to go, too many ways to get there” (Lyrics by Bill Cooper).
Do I fear silence because it brings me face to face with reality, with me, with my end, and the silence thereof?
Why do I fight? Why do I fight what is inevitable? Why do I fear what is inevitable? I don’t fight the air that I breathe. I don’t fight the sunshine. I don’t fight the wind passing through my hair. Why do I fight the great circle of life as the old things pass away to make way for the new?

“Death fertilizes the imaginal and works to open a poetic space that brings depth and meaning to everyday life” (Stanton Marlan, The Black Sun: The Alchemy and Art of Darkness, 76)


Death is part of life.
Death gives way to new life.
The autumn leaves fall and decay
to make way for the spring leaves.
The flower falls to make way for new buds.
Why linger when there is no longer a reason for life?
Let go and let come.
That is the key to all of life.
Let go and let come. Befriend all of life.
Embrace the darkness so that I can fully appreciate the light.
Embrace the cold so that I can fully appreciate the warmth.
Embrace death so that I can fully appreciate life. “The living should take this to heart” while we can.
“An awareness of death is an ally for infusing our lives with a sense of immediacy, perspective, and proportion. In acknowledging the reality of death, we can more fully appreciate our gift of life.” (p. 121, Voluntary Simplicity, Duane Elgin)
IMMEDIACY: Making death an ally makes me realize that what I say is not as important as what is seen in my life. I must join soul and role, words and actions.
PROPORTION: I don’t need the lion’s share, I only need my daily bread. I’m not the center of the universe, I’m a grain of sand on the beach of the universe. It is not about me.
PERSPECTIVE: It is not about accomplishing things, it is about being. What I accomplish in this life is a chasing after the wind. Who am I? Who am I really?
“We need but look into the cemetery and see the ten thousand upturned faces; ten thousand breathless bosoms. There was a time when fire flashed through those vacant orbs; when warm ambitions, hopes, joys, and the loving life pushed in those bosoms. Dreams of fame and power once haunted those empty skulls . . .. Approach the tomb of the proud man; see the haughty countenance dreadfully disfigured, and the tongue that spoke the most lofty things condemned to eternal silence . . .. Behold the consequences of intemperance in the tomb of the glutton; see his appetite now fully satiated, his senses destroyed and his bones scattered” (p. 590 of the book, The Royal Path of Life, 1877 as quoted by Duane Elgin in Voluntary Simplicity).

https://youtu.be/eog8csgE1N4 
“We do not need to grieve for the dead. Why should we grieve for them? They are now in a place where there is no more shadow, darkness, loneliness, isolation, or pain. They are home.”
— John O’Donohue (Anam Cara: A Book of Celtic Wisdom)

When O'Donohue says "home" I see this as referring to being where we belong, where we all go after death in a very inclusive and humanistic way; probably joining the rest of nature in the dirt, or fire and ashes, without any consciousness or awareness. But, who knows, maybe somewhere that death takes us as so many of our human myths say. Who knows? Who cares? What will be... will be. What is... is.

Let's face the monster in the closet and see that the closet is only a closet and stop creating monsters to be afraid of in death so that death can be a part of the circle of life, nothing more, nothing less.


Conquering this monster illusion in death also shatters our facade in life. We hide because we fear that which we do not understand; the unknown, the different, etc. Living without fear, without hiding, is very freeing. It lets us live lives that are real, natural, and human.
Please click here: https://youtu.be/eog8csgE1N4 


See also:

Thursday, July 25, 2019

Making the Unconscious Conscious


Seeing and Discerning Our Myths

Don't believe everything you see.
Don't believe everything you hear.
Don't believe everything you say.
Don't believe everything you think.

"The unexamined life is not worth living" (Socrates)

Rejecting All Authority: Outer and Inner
"Having realized that we can depend on no outside authority in bringing about a total revolution within the structure of our own psyche, there is the immensely greater difficulty of rejecting our own inward authority, the authority of our own particular little experiences and accumulated opinions, knowledge, ideas and ideals." (Krishnamurti, Freedom from the Known)

As I have deepened and intensified my journey toward what is real, daily letting go of comfort, security, and certainty, I have felt a need to discern that which I have downloaded from society (cultural conditioning) from that which is sort of an ancient knowing, that is innate... profound truth.

Am I a second hand person that lives my life based on what I have been told, based on a truth that comes from the experiences and certainties of others?

Or do I embrace the need to do the innerwork to discern truth from within; original and authentic?

But this inner authority is a tricky bedfellow. “Thought creates the world and then says ‘I didn’t do it.’” (David Bohm). What is the source of my truth. Is it the conditioned thinking that Bohm, Jung, and Krishnamurti are referring to? Or can I discern inner truth beyond this duality and see reality, not based on thought, but based on nondual awareness and on a deep resonance; an ancient knowing that comes alive as we awaken?

"If we indulge the human propensity to understate, exaggerate, and alter facts for whatever comfort or false security a lie might accord us, we forfeit our capacity to see reality clearly, and see only a world of our own invention."
—Lin Jensen, "Right Lying"

What is Belief?

"We create the world that we perceive, not because there is no reality outside our heads, but because we select and edit the reality we see to conform to our beliefs about what sort of world we live in. The man who believes that the resources of the world are infinite, for example, or that if something is good for you then the more of it the better, will not be able to see his errors, because he will not look for evidence of them. For a man to change the basic beliefs that determine his perception - his epistemological premises - he must first become aware that reality is not necessarily as he believes it to be. Sometimes the dissonance between reality and false beliefs reaches a point when it becomes impossible to avoid the awareness that the world no longer makes sense. Only then is it possible for the mind to consider radically different ideas and perceptions."
(Gregory Bateson, Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology)

The following is from an online conversation on social media with Rajiv, a friend from India that sees things very similarly as I do even though he grew up in such a different culture and religious context.
Rajiv Pande Our beliefs precede the evidence for them.
Belief is what happens to you when you are not looking. An imperceptible and yet powerful current that carries you away, and sometimes so far off track that you wonder how and why you ended up being where you are.
2
  • Ron Irvine Rajiv Pande I've spent my first 50 years being carried away by beliefs, both imperceptible and powerful and the last 10 years making the imperceptible perceptible so I can sort through the trash and the treasures that are left still powerfully trying to define my life.
    1
  • Rajiv Pande I think what was once instinct in the animal world transformed to belief at the human level of evolution. Belief is a kind of substitute for the real or natural thing - a rationalized, narrated thing that envelopes and encloses one almost as completely as animals are immersed in instinct. We think we have an opinion or that we've made a choice but actually we have been drowned, our individuality and freedom dissolved in something seemingly greater than us. Belief systems can be so powerful that they are almost as effective as the formation of species in the animal world. Tribes, communities, nations, religions are the end result of this emotional intensity carried over from what was once animal instinct. Our task as humans is to be rational, to not be swayed by the seething and bubbling hot lava of emotion just below the outer layer of civilization and to keep it contained at all times.
My response was, "Wow!" He really nailed it for me.

Our similarities in perspective have been remarkable as we have grown to know each other over the past 10 years, often reflecting on each other's social media posts and blog posts. How does a person see through, see past, and grow beyond our conditioned upbringing; our cultural instincts that we so automatically believe.


What is Myth?

In this context, I use myth in the same way that Joseph Campbell developed myth in his book, The Power of Myth, as foundational to culture and individuals . Myths are the stories in our heads that we use to create meaning in our lives. Whether a myth is a true story or not is not at all the point. Myths shape our thinking, values, beliefs, and actions in both positive and negative ways. For instance, myths are created and broadcast in the news everyday; sometimes to tell the truth and sometimes to spin political beliefs. Myths also create assumptions, preconceived ideas, judgmental stances, and unfounded fears upon which we are building our democracy. The point is not if myths are true. The point is the impact they have on us; individually or collectively. How do they shape us? But an even bigger question is this, are we aware of our own myths that we have adopted, or that we have been told? Cultural conditioning is a powerful thing. It happens to all of us but not all of us are aware of this. We simply download ideas, mostly unaware, and go on living our lives with very little consciousness about how we became the person that we are; why we think what we think, why we feel what we feel, why we say what we say, and why we do what we do. Why DO we react, act, and interact in the ways that we do?

“Until you make the unconscious conscious,
it will direct your life,
and you will call it fate.”
(Carl Jung)

"It’s hard being a human being. Not only is our external world often demanding, but inside we’re a confusing mix of conflicting emotions and competing desires.
"Complicated creatures, we are each a mix of light and dark. For those of us on a spiritual path, it is essential that we explore this inner territory, for what lies outside our awareness exerts a powerful control over it." (Leia Marie Faith.   https://www.chieftain.com/26bc3b8c-c393-11e8-a446-a7dc25b427f9.html)

Why do we sometimes surprise ourselves by saying or doing something that seems very out of character and then regret it? What is going on under the surface of our lives? What myths are swimming about in those murky waters beneath the surface of my consciousness; preconscious or subconscious surges hacking and hijacking my life.

DO I know? Of course not, because subconscious means that we are not conscious of those subtle influences, drives, and forces; sometimes not so subtle.

CAN I know? Of course I can, but it takes the hard work of doing the innerwork necessary to bring to consciousness that which is currently subconscious. It is both exhausting and exhilarating.

Do I WANT to know? Do I want to go through life as an automaton, following the herd, believing and doing what I’ve been told? Or will I do the innerwork of becoming conscious of the myths within and the power and influence they have? We cannot be free until we do the work of seeing our myths, understanding their power over us (their impact on us), and then carefully choosing the myths that we live by while letting go of those that are no longer helpful or inspiring; that no longer show me the truth within.

“All religions have been true for their time. If you can recognize the enduring aspect of their truth and separate it from the temporal applications, you’ve got it… Myths grab you somewhere down inside. As a boy, you go at it one way, as I did reading my Indian stories. Later on, myths tell you more, and more, and still more. I think that anyone who has ever dealt seriously with religious or mythic ideas will tell you that we learn them as a child on one level, but then many different levels are revealed. Myths are infinite in their revelation.”
― Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth

I think what Campbell means by this is that:

First, we must do the inner work necessary to first SEE the myths that we have adopted whether consciously or subconsciously.

Second, we must learn to DISCERN the veracity and impact of those myths that have gripped us over the years.

Third, we must revive or recreate a new world of myths, a mythology of meaning, that we can live by; with others and with integrity… a sustainable world and life view. We do this by sorting through the trash and treasures and reweaving the fabric of our underlying personal and collective plane of existence from which all of life unfolds; individual and collective. At the same time, aligning this with the universal plane of existence from which the whole universe unfolds.

What is the source of our values and beliefs; of our myths? Love or Fear? 
Why do I follow the politics that I follow? 
Why do I follow the religion that I follow?
What defines my love and hate?
What defines my hopes and fears?

Do I do these things automatically, 
Because of my family?
Because of my zip code?
Because of my peer group?
Because it is easier to follow the herd???

Am I a second hand person
or am I an original individual
... the real deal?

A New Organizing Myth

But what happens when our organizing, sustaining myth, or story, or drama is no longer meaningful. We have grown beyond the stories of 2000 or 4000 years ago.

We need to create a new myth
about a people that are envisioning and creating
a world that works for ALL,
where ALL means ALL,
that includes each and every person,
that believes in each and every person,
that believes that each person comes here as a gift and full of gifts,
and that for every gift there is a place that needs that gift;
an organizing myth that teaches that
when each person uses the simplest of gifts
in a context that accepts and appreciates those gifts,
then THAT is a meaningful life.
A myth that knows we are all
 connected, nurtured, and sustained
by that which is greater than me.
But knows that this sustaining reality
is beyond understanding; full of mystery,
boundless and limitless, immanent and transcendent.
A myth that acknowledges that
being right and making others wrong
is not what life is about.
It is not a matter of being right
but rather living right
so that the life we lead
makes an impact and
leaves this world better.

Underlying all of perceived, material reality is a deeper reality that supports what we see and experience. This deeper level is what David Bohm (Physicist) refers to as the implicate order of the universe, enfolded reality that then unfolds into the explicate order that which we perceive and then enfolds back into itself, containing like a hologram the whole universe.  In this sense, the enfolded universe contains all of 'what is' while unfolding as needed into a physical reality. In this way, everything has its place in its time and then enfolds back into the underlying implicate order. This is similar to what quantum physics is telling us about the universe.

Did you know?
4% of the universe is physical matter.
23% is dark matter.
73% is empty space that is not empty but is teeming with creative energy and apparent intelligence. Possibly that "stuff" that holds the universe together, keeping it from flying apart or collapsing on itself. Is this emptiness the implicate order?

Scientists are struggling to name this "emptiness" but have theories that describe it as a matrix, web, ether, and even the "'strong force' that literally holds existence together."

"Here's what makes the 'strong force' so fascinating: unlike an electromagnetic force, which decreases as you pull the two charged particles apart, the strong force actually gets stronger the further apart the particles go. It gets so strong that it limits how far two quarks can separate. Once they hit that limit, that's when the magic happens: the huge amount of energy it took for them to separate is converted to mass, following   Einstein's famous equation E = mc2. That's right—the strongest force in the universe is strong enough to turn energy into matter, the thing that makes up existence as you know it."
https://curiosity.com/topics/the-strong-force-is-whats-holding-the-entire-universe-together-curiosity/

What resonates with me about this way of seeing the universe, this possible new organizing myth, is that it shows that:
There is a unified source from which we all spring.
There is a unifying force by which we (and all of existence) are all connected.
There is a sustaining force that nurtures all of existence.
There is a creative force, the source that brings matter into existence from energy.
There is an intentional force that keeps us growing and evolving forward.

And I see this power of intention being individual and collective and universal.
I also see this as parallel to consciousness; individual, collective, and universal.
All connected, all the same essence, all the same source.

David Bohm's Implicate and Explicate Order

"Implicate order and explicate order are ontological concepts for quantum theory coined by theoretical physicist David Bohm during the early 1980s. They are used to describe two different frameworks for understanding the same phenomenon or aspect of reality. In particular, the concepts were developed in order to explain the bizarre behavior of subatomic particles which quantum physics struggles to explain.

"The implicate (also referred to as the "enfolded") order is seen as a deeper and more fundamental order of reality. In contrast, the explicate or "unfolded" order include the abstractions that humans normally perceive. As he wrote,
In the enfolded [or implicate] order, space and time are no longer the dominant factors determining the relationships of dependence or independence of different elements. Rather, an entirely different sort of basic connection of elements is possible, from which our ordinary notions of space and time, along with those of separately existent material particles, are abstracted as forms derived from the deeper order.

"The notion of implicate and explicate orders emphasizes the primacy of structure and process over individual objects. The latter are seen as mere approximations of an underlying process. In this approach, quantum particles and other objects are understood to have only a limited degree of stability and autonomy.[2]

"Bohm believes that the weirdness of the behavior of quantum particles is caused by unobserved forces, maintaining that space and time might actually be derived from an even deeper level of objective reality. In the words of F. David Peat, Bohm considers that what we take for reality are "surface phenomena, explicate forms that have temporarily unfolded out of an underlying implicate order". That is, the implicate order is the ground from which reality emerges.[3]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order 

In other words, the implicate order is the source or ground of being.
Joseph Campbell's Underlying Plane of Existence 
Invisible versus Visible, Nondual versus Dual

All peoples, all tribes, all civilizations throughout history have developed mythologies to describe their understanding of their own existence. Similar themes run throughout history going back to drawings on cave walls.

"All of mythology is summed up with this: There is a plane of existence where we live. It is tangible, visible, temporal. But behind it is a plane of existence that is invisible, eternal, intangible. This plane supports the temporal plane.

"A shaman crosses between the two planes. But the myths, stories, and religion is created from the invisible plane. This plane is nondual. This is from where the religions of the First Peoples were created; from this eternal plane of existence. Or from where both planes are touching; the “thin” places.

"Christianity, Judaism, and Islam are created out of the plane of duality through books, words of the prophets. The male warrior gods (Yahweh and Allah) are jealous, angry, vengeful, full of hate, say one thing and do another, but say they are gods of love and peace.

"The holy grail is brought down by the neutral angels. All of our actions cause both good and bad results. We must balance between dualities. And yet lean toward the light. The grail represents the purest human motivation and consciousness; that which is not influenced by duality but only by our own inner intentions; not what we are told but what we determine.

"Jesus’ teachings and parables are a combination of stories based in the eternal and stories based in the temporal. There are many parallels between the Jesus and the Buddha.

“Every god, every mythology, every religion is true in this sense: it is true as metaphorical of the human and cosmic mystery. He who thinks he knows doesn’t know. He who knows that he doesn’t know knows.”

“In the East, the gods are much more elemental. Less human and more like the power of nature.”

“In oriental thinking, the god is the vehicle of the energy, not its source.”

"The gospel of Thomas: “The kingdom of the father will not come by expectation. The kingdom of the father is spread upon the face of the earth and you do not see it.”

"What is religion? Religion comes from 'religio' which means 'linking back.' From the phenomenal person, we link back to the source.

"That’s the essence of burial. You put back into the earth for rebirth.

"Creating a Mandala for oneself is a matter of graphically illustrating all of the energies of your life and then finding the source, the center of all of the aspects of oneself. So you are trying to coordinate your circle with the universal circle.

"Jung’s archetypes refer to the similar ideas that arise in different cultures without any connection between them. There are certain motifs that appear among different people in different places in different times."
(The Power of Myth)

Only Love
When Gregg Braden studied under some Tibetan Monks, he described that essence of the ether that
permeates the universe, that which he calls the Divine Matrix, he asked the master what is it that fills, sustains, and nurtures the universe. The monk looked at the interpreter and interacted trying to boil it down to the essence. Then he looked at Gregg and said, "Love."

“Love is the whole thing.We are only pieces.” (Rumi)

"Oh Love that fires the sun, keep me burning." (Bruce Cockburn, song lyrics)


The Task of Tasks
"I asked myself, 'What is the myth you are living?' and found that I did not know. So... I took it upon myself to get to know my myth, and I regarded this as the task of tasks... I simply had to know what unconscious or preconscious myth was forming me." (Carl Jung)

More about the Space Between
https://curiosity.com/topics/empty-space-isnt-empty-and-quantum-researchers-now-have-direct-evidence-curiosity/

Universal Consciousness

From which we emerge...

Developing a Unified Theory of Everything









Tuesday, July 2, 2019

Grounded in Groundlessness


Simplicity on the surface has to do with consumer choices of clothing or food or shelter.

But in a deeper sense, true simplicity must begin within.

This simplicity begins with uprooting and ungrounding the ego; seeing and letting go of assumptions.

Simplicity requires the inner work of seeing with clear perceptions and understandings, pure integrity and authenticity;

And doing the inner work of sorting through the trash and treasures, the clutter of conditioning lodged deep within.

Stillness: learning to sit and feel and see…

“And sitting lets us begin to do that. It doesn’t do it right away, because what we first are confronted with is just the assault of the amount of thoughts and the mixed messages that just inhabit our body and our mind and our experience on an ongoing basis — that when we sit, the first thing we’re met
with is not quiet or calm or peace. The first thing we’re met with is, ‘Oh, my God. Who is in here, and why won’t they shut up? How do I get them to stop?’ And not only is something and someone and everyone speaking to me, it’s mixed messages. Things don’t agree with each other. I don’t agree with my own truth. I’m having arguments in here that are not my arguments, they are someone else’s arguments. They’re my parents’ arguments. Sitting lets us just, first of all, recognize that we are this massive collection of thoughts and experiences and sensations that are moving at the speed of light and that we never get a chance to just be still and pause and look at them, just for what they are, and then slowly to sort out our own voice from the rest of the thoughts, emotions, the interpretations, the habits, the momentums that are just trying to overwhelm us at any given moment.